• The Black Monk of Pontefract Part I

    “It would be so nice if you weren’t here.”—comment made to Charles Grodin

     

    What should be one of the most well-known poltergeist cases of all time is one that is almost completely unknown and was not even investigated until a decade after it ended. If it hadn’t been stumbled upon by a history buff doing some research in the area in the mid-1970s, it might never have been heard of outside of the little town in which it occurred. He interviewed the family and a number of witnesses, then called paranormal author Colin Wilson to see if he would be interested writing something about the case. It turned out that he was.

    Pontefract is a small hamlet in the UK that dates back to Roman times. In Latin, the name means “broken bridge,” so apparently at some point long ago, a bridge broke somewhere around there. There had also once been a monastery for Cluniac monks nearby. One of these details is probably significant. If you were to try to guess which one at this point, you’d probably be wrong.

    Ghost monkThe weirdness started in 1966 in a home belonging to a family named Pritchard. Jean and Joe Pritchard and their 12-year-old daughter Diane had gone on holiday, leaving their 15-year-old son Phillip and the house in the care of Mrs. Pritchard’s mother Sarah Scholes. One afternoon, Phillip walked into the living room where his grandmother was knitting and discovered that a fine, white powder was falling and covering everything in the room, including Mrs. Scholes, who had so far failed to notice. He looked up at the ceiling to see where this powder was coming from and discovered that it was only falling from about four feet in the air. The top half of the room was clear.

    Once Mrs. Scholes became aware of the situation, she went across the street to fetch her other daughter Marie Kelly. Marie came over and also saw the powder falling. She went into the kitchen to get a broom and dustpan to clean up the mess and found a puddle of water on the floor. When she pulled up the linoleum to see if it had seeped up from under the floor, she found the boards underneath were dry. Over the next several hours, more puddles formed almost as fast as they could mop them up, even after they had shut off the water to the house. A repairman from the local water board came out, but he could find no cause for them.

    Once the falling powder and mysterious puddles had stopped and been cleaned up, everyone left. That night, Phillip and Mrs. Scholes experienced some more typical poltergeist-type manifestations (although mysterious puddles of water aren’t really unusual in these cases*). They heard a crash and discovered that a potted plant at the foot of the stairs had been hurled up to the top landing. Moments later, a cupboard began to shake violently as if something inside was trying to get out. It stopped as soon as Phillip pulled the door open. There were also repeated banging sounds on the walls.

    By 9:30, things had calmed down and they decided to go to bed. When Mrs. Scholes went into Phillip’s room to tell him goodnight, his wardrobe began rocking and swaying in the corner. At this point, they both decided that they’d had enough. They went across the street and spent the night at Marie and Victor Kelly’s house.

    After they were asleep, Marie and Vic decided to go see a neighbor of theirs from down the street named O’Donald who had an interest in ghosts. Mr. O’Donald was still awake and agreed to go with them to the house. When they opened the front door, they were hit by a blast of frigid air, but found nothing else out of the ordinary as they searched the place. Mr. O’Donald then explained to them the difference between ghosts and poltergeists and mentioned that the latter were fond of tearing up pictures for some reason. After O’Donald had left and the Kelly’s were locking the door behind them, they heard a crash. When they went back in to investigate, they found that a framed picture from Jean and Joe’s wedding had been smashed on the floor. The glass was broken and the photo had been slashed in two, as if whatever was responsible for this had heard Mr. O’Donald talking and had taken his offhand observation as a suggestion.

    All was quiet for the next two days until the rest of the Pritchard family returned home. When Phillip and Mrs. Scholes recounted the story of these occurrences to them, Joe Pritchard was unimpressed and asked what sort of banging they had heard. Right on cue, there were three loud knocks (these things usually seem to come in threes), followed by a rattling of the windows as a cold breeze blew through the house. Then the rattling and the wind subsided, and all was back to normal. Two years would go by until their next encounter with the unknown entity.

    Almost exactly two years later, Jean Pritchard and Sarah Scholes were having tea in the kitchen when Mrs. Scholes mentioned the previous events and said that she feared that it was all about to start happening again. Jean dismissed the idea, but when she left to go upstairs, she found her daughter’s bedspread lying at the foot of the stairs. She was confused but not overly concerned. As she placed the covering back on Diane’s bed, she heard a crash. She went out into the hallway to find Phillip’s bedspread at the bottom of the stairs and several potted plants upended on the on the carpet.

    Late that night, Jean woke up and stepped out into the hallway, presumably intending to check on the kids. She saw something moving at the end of the hall and turned on the light just in time to see a paintbrush go flying past her head. Her scream woke up the rest of the family, and for the next several minutes, they were all attacked by a whirlwind of paintbrushes and rolls of wallpaper. Only Diane was actually struck by one of the brushes, and although it was moving quite fast, she barely felt it hit her. When the flying redecorating supplies moved into her room, Joe shut the door and Diane spent the rest of the night in her parents’ room.

    Typical poltergeist shenanigans continued for the next nine months. Fairly early on, they decided that what they needed was to have an exorcism performed on the house. Fortunately, the Anglican priest who visited them to discuss this option was aware that exorcisms frequently only made things worse in these sorts of cases. He advised the family to just move away before one of them got hurt. What he was unaware of is that people are rarely, if ever, seriously harmed by poltergeists. They seem to lack either the ability or the desire to really injure anyone, although threats of violence are not uncommon, usually scrawled on walls or mirrors and almost always directed solely at one particular person.

    The Pritchard's staircaseAs if to demonstrate this, that night as Diane was heading up to bed, a large oak stand in the living room weighing several hundred pounds floated up the stairs and landed on top of her, pinning her there. However, she could tell that the full weight of the thing was not on her. She couldn’t push it off of her, but at least she wasn’t being crushed. She called out to her family for help, and they tried to pull it off of her, but it wouldn’t budge. As Diane realized that she didn’t seem to be in any real danger, she was able to relax a little. As she did so, she felt a change in the force that was holding her there. She asked her family to try again, and this time they were able to lift the stand and set her free. Afterward, although the whole ordeal had left her understandably flustered, she said that she had never really felt that she was in any serious danger. She seemed to sense that this thing felt no real malice for her. Nevertheless, it wasn’t done with her yet.

    Diane went off to bed somewhat unfazed, but it was not to be a restful evening. Four times that night, she found herself being woken up by being flipped off of her bed and onto the floor with her mattress landing on top of her. Still, she suffered no injuries whatsoever. Whatever was doing this seemed to have more of a schoolboy crush than any desire to do her harm.

    Not long after this, Jean ran into an acquaintance named Rene Holden, who had a reputation for being a bit psychic. Rene agreed to try to help the Pritchards deal with their unwanted guest. On one occasion while she was at the house for dinner, the lights went out and objects started flying all around the room. By the time they got the lights back on, all of this had stopped, but they found that almost all of the furniture had been flipped over and smaller items were scattered all across the room. The only exception was a table on which there had been a tray full of sandwiches. The tray and table were both left undisturbed, but all of the sandwiches were gone. Jean found one of them behind the television, and something with a large mouth and huge teeth seemed to have taken a bite out of it. Rene decided to keep the sandwich and wrapped in plastic, intending to use it as proof that something bizarre was going on in the house, but it disintegrated into crumbs within a few days.

    Ever since this had begun, both Phillip and Diane had been suffering from a stomach ailment that got worse whenever Mr. Nobody, the name they had given their unknown intruder, started acting up. Diane described it as a feeling of being twisted up inside. Rene came to the conclusion that this entity was somehow drawing its power from the children through their solar plexuses (plexusi?).

    As insightful and accurate as this might have been, it’s also not original. Poltergeists have long been believed by many to draw their power from people, typically a teenager and usually a girl. Also, the solar plexus is routinely mentioned by mystics as being a sort of hub for life-force energies, whatever that means. For instance, some people who have had out-of-body experiences have reported seeing a silver cord coming out of the stomach of their etheric body and connecting to the same point on their physical body. Nevertheless, we should probably give Mrs. Holden some credit for being aware of this. She also suspected that there was a connection between these experiences and the underground river running beneath their house, which was another good catch. Unusual phenomena of almost all sorts seem to have an affinity for water, and this probably has some correlation to poltergeists leaving puddles everywhere.

    Despite being annoying and even destructive at times, Mr. Nobody also clearly possessed a sense of humor, along with a keen understanding of just who deserved to be made the butt of a good joke. The woman that he chose to make a complete fool of sounds like she would have made a good supporting villain in a Dickens novel.

    Joe Pritchard’s Aunt Maude had heard all about the goings-on at her nephew’s house, and she considered it all to be nonsense. Upon arriving at the house to assess this foolishness for herself, she immediately annoyed her nephew by summarily announcing that it was all a prank being played by the children. No sooner had she made this accusation right in front of Diane and Phillip than the lights went out and the whole room was suddenly visible only by the glow from the fireplace in the kitchen where they were sitting. The refrigerator door then swung open, and a gallon jug of milk floated out. It made its way across the room and promptly emptied itself over Aunt Maude’s head, soaking her and the chair on which she was sitting.

    After they got the lights back on, the suddenly lactose indignant Aunt Maude again accused the children of being responsible, to which Jean angrily replied that they had been by her side throughout the whole incident. But Aunt Maude didn’t want to hear it, so they invited her to spend the night, knowing from experience that Mr. Nobody probably wasn’t done with her just yet. Being the kind of person that I suspect can never admit that they’re wrong, Aunt Maude took them up on their offer, and ended up wishing that she hadn’t.

    The Pritchard's house in PontefractAfter the lights went out again and some furniture flipped over and things flew out of the cupboards, they decided to go to bed. Maude, Jean and Diane were all bunking together in Phillip’s room for some reason. As they were about to call it a night, a lamp lifted off of the bedside table and floated out the door. Then four small light bulbs that had been removed from the electric fireplace glowed as they danced in the air around the door. This was followed by the appearance of two large hands that turned out to be Aunt Maude’s fur gloves hovering in the doorway. Maude told whatever it was to go away and threw one of her boots at the door. The gloves vanished but reappeared moments later. This time one of them made a beckoning gesture as if it wanted them to follow it. When no one moved, the glove clenched into a fist and shook itself threateningly at Aunt Maude. She responded by breaking into a rendition of “Onward Christian Soldiers.” Not to be outdone, the gloves began to move with the music as if conducting her singing. Despite being frightened, Jean said that couldn’t help but smile at this. Aunt Maude’s assessment of the situation was less lighthearted. She declared that they had the Devil in their house.

    When Maude left the next morning, she said that she would never return. When Jean called to tell her that her gloves had turned up a few days later, she said that she would not be picking them up. When Jean returned them to her, she refused to touch them. She took them with a pair of garden tongs and burned them on the rubbish heap. I guess they still had rubbish heaps in West Yorkshire County back then.

     

    Well this has taken much longer than I anticipated, and we’re just barely past the halfway point. So…

    Tune in next week for the exciting conclusion of (pause for dramatic effect) The Black Monk of Pontefract!

    __________________________________________________________________________________

    *These puddles almost always have clearly defined borders and show no signs of spatter, as if they just somehow leak from a source near the ground. One theory is that they are a kind of condensation that forms around a release of energy. Hell if I know.

    and all the devils are here

     


  • Quetzalcoatl: Man, Myth or Super-Intelligent Archaeopteryx?

    “Take great pains to make yourselves friends of God who is in all parts, and is invisible and impalpable, and it is meant that you give Him all your heart and body, and look that you be not proud in your heart, nor yet despair, nor be cowardly of spirit; but that you be humble in your heart and have hope in God. Be at peace with all, shame yourselves before none and to none be disrespectful; respect all, esteem all, defy no one, for no reason affront any person.”—Quetzalcoatl (allegedly)

     

    Painting of Quetzalcoatl Writing about the Mayan motifs found in some crop formations recently got me thinking about some of the various and fragmented things that I know about Native American history and mythology. Mostly, it got me thinking about Quetzalcoatl. Although I didn’t mention it because I think it’s silly, there are some who think that he was an alien and that this is why there have been so many Mayan themes included in these formations. I guess anything is possible.

    I’ve been meaning to learn more about Quetzalcoatl for a long time, but I’ve just never quite gotten around to it. By that, I mean the legends about the white dude in long robes who some think was Jesus and allegedly taught the Mesoamericans about everything from art to science to civilization, not Quetzalcoatl the god. What’s the difference? That’s a tricky question. I shall do my best to clear that up.

    Quetzalcoatl the god goes way back in Mesoamerican mythology, although there is some debate about how far. His name translates as feathered serpent: quetzal meaning feather, and coatl being snake in the Nahuatl language. He was known by many other names by different groups, most of which still translate, more or less, to feathered serpent, and he was the god of so many various things that it’s hard to pin down exactly what his role was. What is generally agreed upon is that he was a god of culture and civilization. There are also several stories that claim that he created us, or at least he helped out. (That could be interpreted metaphorically, even if it wasn’t meant that way. Stay tuned.) What isn’t agreed upon is pretty much everything else.

    One of the most amazing things about the history of ancient Mesoamerican civilizations is how little we know about them and how much the supposed experts disagree on. This includes not being able to agree when certain things happened (or even if they did happen), and sometimes their estimates are hundreds of years apart. And if this isn’t confusing enough, various rulers and priests from these different cultures had a habit of taking the name of one of their gods, so there were lots of important men in these civilizations who called themselves Quetzalcoatl, or Kukulcan, or whatever their name for him was. All of this makes it almost impossible to separate facts from myths. Add to that the New Age crap that some pinheads spew, apparently based solely on what they want to believe is true, and you get one very convoluted picture. At least the complete failure of December 21, 2012 to have amounted to anything has shut most of that last bunch up.

    Now that we’ve completely failed to clear all of that up, let’s move on to the legend of this mysterious stranger and see if we can untangle who he might have been and what he had to say about things.

    This particular Quetzalcoatl is described as being tall, fair skinned and having a beard, sometimes with blond hair and blue eyes. He either wore long white robes or armor – a contradictory detail of some significance but which we have no way of confirming either way. Exactly when he arrived on the scene is, naturally, a matter of some debate. Although most scholars reject the idea that he ever existed as anything but a myth, if such a man ever did really exist, the general consensus is that he showed up at about the time of the emergence of the Toltec empire around 1000 CE and may have been the guiding force behind its rise to power. He may have also been in contact with the few remaining Mayans of the time, who called him Kukulcan, and whose civilization had been in decline for centuries at that point and was then just a shadow of its former self.

    Most of what we know of this guy comes from the Aztecs, whose empire followed on the heels of the demise of the Toltecs. Despite the fact that they were definitely a few rungs down on the enlightenment ladder, you have to give the Aztecs some credit. They freely admitted that they were basically squatters in the cities of those who came before them, unlike the Egyptians pharaohs who tried to erase all records of their predecessors so that they could take credit for all of their accomplishments. The downside is that most of our information about the enigmatic Quetzalcoatl comes from a secondhand civilization that revered him but didn’t really practice what he preached. This doesn’t necessarily invalidate their story by itself. What the Catholic Inquisitions did was at least as bad as the human sacrifice practiced by the Aztecs, but they still knew all about Jesus. For that matter, the Toltecs also practiced human sacrifice even though Quetzalcoatl condemned this practice, so either he wasn’t as influential as we’ve been led to believe, or his followers fell back into bad habits after he left. No one who thinks that he was real has ever been able to satisfactorily explain this. Somewhat ironically, this is where his story begins, or at least one version of it.

    Quetzalcoatl was said to have arrived in the Toltec city of Tollan just as a priest was about to make a sacrifice to Tezcatlipoca, who just happens to be the god Quetzalcoatl’s brother. Quetz was not at all happy about this act of barbarity and ordered them to stop. The angry priest replied that if they didn’t do this then horrible, nasty, awful things would happen to the city, but Queatz assured them that as long as he was there, the city would flourish. For whatever reason, they believed him, maybe because they had never seen a blond hippie before and didn’t know quite what to make of him.

    After this, he went on to teach them about science, especially astronomy, how to grow corn, dye cotton, work gold, etc. He is also said by some to have devised their calendar and taught them to worship one god. After a time, he left the Toltecs and sailed away to the east from whence he had come, promising to return one day, as gods always do.

    Quetzalcoatl as JesusThe main problem with all of this is that there had already been Mesoamerican cultures who knew how to do all of these things before then and that there is no evidence that any of them, including the Toltecs, ever worshiped just one god. No wonder most of the “experts” consider him to be a myth. But if he was a myth, where did the idea of a bearded white guy come from? In case you’ve never noticed, Native Americans with beards are extremely rare, and the ones in that region were pretty well bronzed as well.

    For some, the answer is quite simple: he was Jesus. Most Mormons accept this explanation even though the LDS Church doesn’t officially make that claim. John Taylor, third president of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints wrote in 1882

    The story of the life of the Mexican divinity, Quetzalcoatl, closely resembles that of the Savior; so closely, indeed, that we can come to no other conclusion than that Quetzalcoatl and Christ are the same being. But the history of the former has been handed down to us through an impure Lamanitish source, which has sadly disfigured and perverted the original incidents and teachings of the Savior’s life and ministry.

    Since The Book of Mormon states that Jesus came to America after his resurrection, I suppose this makes perfect sense…at least to them.

    Another less esoteric theory is that Quetz was actually a group of Vikings that arrived in the area around this time. Perhaps the natives of the region had possessed all of the aforementioned knowledge in the past but had forgotten it, so these Vikings decided to re-teach them what it was obvious that they had once known judging by their ancient art and architecture. It’s possible, but that doesn’t sound like the Vikings I know. I’ve never heard them described as being anything even remotely similar to teachers of culture and civilization. Some sources have claimed that this theory is strengthened by the fact that Quetzalcoatl was said to have shown up wearing armor rather than robes, but that’s probably revisionist history put forth by those who want to believe this version of the story for whatever reason. There are also supposedly paintings of red-bearded men with swords engaged in battle that have been found in the area, but I can’t find them anywhere.* At least that does sound more like what we would expect from Vikings.

    A theory that I originally dismissed but have now warmed up to a bit is the idea that Quetzalcoatl and his clan may have come from Atlantis. My initial rejection of this idea wasn’t based on a disbelief that such a place has ever existed: there is plenty of evidence that at least one somewhat advanced civilization existed before what is generally agreed upon by mainstream science. (I am especially fond of Michael Cremo’s term “forbidden archaeology” to describe this field of study.) What bothered me was the timeline. The first written mention of Atlantis that is accepted by mainstream scholars was in Timaes by Plato, and he claimed that his knowledge of the place came from Solon, who in turn said that he heard about it from Egyptian priests. This puts its existence back to around 1000 BCE at the very latest. Most historical heretics think that Atlantis was destroyed thousands of years earlier than that.

    This was way before Quetz arrived on the scene, so I quickly ruled out this possibility for his origin. But the more I kept digging, the more pervasive I found the “white god” mythos to be. It existed in cultures across many centuries from Mexico all the way down into South America. I was especially impressed by the legend of Viracocha, the creator god of the Incas and their forebears who was also said to be white, bearded and connected with the sea. He also left by sailing away, in this case west across the Pacific (or walking on the water by some accounts) but it was believed that he would someday return. He was also connected with a great flood that destroyed most of humanity (sound familiar?). In fact, the more I learned about Viracocha, the more I came to realize that he was a better Quetzalcoatl than Quetz had ever been.

    Like the feathered serpent god, we really have no good indication of how far back the origin of Viracocha goes. Most modern scholars now claim that the idea of bearded white gods was started by the Spanish invaders. There is some evidence that this could be true, but as is often the case, much of their dismissal of inconvenient ideas seems more a matter of expedience and doesn’t make a great deal of sense. Why the Spanish would have done this is far from clear. The archaeological company line is that they were trying to convince the natives that they were gods. I guess it’s possible, but wouldn’t these people have known enough about their own deities that there was no way that they would have fallen for this? And why were only some of their gods white? How would all of this have worked?

    Cortes: Hi there Moctezuma. I’m one of your gods. You should know this because I’m white and have a beard like Quetzalcoatl, but not any of your other gods for some reason.

    Moctezuma: Quetzalcoatl was white and had hair on his face?

    Cortes: Yes, now do everything I say and give me all of your gold.

    Moctezuma: Okay, I guess that sounds reasonable enough. Here you go.

    And just in case I haven’t made it clear enough, all of these white gods from various cultures had a lot in common and were all said to have shown up in person to bring knowledge of science and civilization to the people. If any of their other gods ever put in a personal appearance, I’m not aware of it. I’m fairly certain that at least one of the skeptics would have pointed this out.

    However, in the interest of fairness and accuracy, I’ll play experts advocate for a moment and admit that this tactic of pretending to be gods isn’t completely without precedent. When the missionaries were attempting to spread Christianity across Central and Northern Europe, one of their methods was to incorporate some pagan rituals and beliefs into Christianity, and some of them are still there today. Also, some of their gods were converted into Christian saints as a way to appease them. The goddess Bridgette became Saint Bridgette, and Demeter became Saint Demetrius, changing sex in the process, which is supposed to be the sort of thing that the Catholic Church frowns upon. On the other hand, the Horned God became Satan so that they could accuse his followers of worshiping the Devil.**

    Noah's Ark: photo by Shem
    Noah’s Ark (photo by Shem)

    Just to be difficult. I’m going to proceed on the assumption that the experts are wrong and that these legends about white guys have some basis in fact. Since they appeared all over this region, and at least one of them can be traced back to the time of the Great Flood (possibly the one that we typically associate with Noah but which has been recorded in legends from around the world and so might have actually happened), it’s not unreasonable to suspect that he/they showed up much earlier than is generally reported. The myths about Quetzalcoatl, Viracocha, et al. were all conceivably based on a much older truth that may have had its roots in lost civilizations.

    Estimates of when the Great Flood occurred usually place it at around 5000 BCE. The earliest written record of it is in the Epic of Gilgamesh, written around 2100 BCE. Just to be clear, I’m not saying that this flood is what wiped out Atlantis. Most who subscribe to the theory of its existence think that it was destroyed long before that. I’m just using Viracocha’s association with this event to try to find a marker in time. If 5000 BCE is accurate, this puts him back at the very earliest estimates of the beginnings of farming and domesticating animals in South America, which just happened to have been in Peru, right where the Incas would later build their empire and tell stories about Viracocha.

    Skeletal remains found in the area from this time indicate a very different group of people than the ones the Spaniards found living there. These earlier people had elongated skulls with pronounced jawbones. This sounds like the mysterious moai statues of the Easter Islands. This, along with Viracocha’s association with the Pacific Ocean, indicates that if a lost civilization was the origin of these people, it was most likely Lemuria, or Mu, the Pacific version of the Atlantean legend. And just to throw another wrinkle in this already wrinkly subject, the melting of the glaciers from the last ice age that likely triggered the Great Flood really kicked in about 12,000 years ago. This could have flooded any island civilizations long before it reached higher elevations in the Middle East where Noah lived.

    Genetic analysis of Native American remains has yielded some interesting results. Most of this work has been done on North American remains and is more indicative of an Atlantean civilization, but only a small percentage of Native American groups have been tested. If the ancient Peruvian skeletons have been analyzed, I can’t find any record of it. If and when they are, I would be surprised if they don’t turn out to share a type of mitochondrial DNA found in Asians and Polynesians.

    While none of this testing has yet proven the existence of any lost civilizations, when the Iroquois of North America and the Basque people of Spain have been shown to share some common ancestors, it definitely raises some interesting points. The Basque have long been considered by some to be the descendants of refugees from Atlantis, and Iroquois legends tell of them coming to America after fleeing their original homeland following a great disaster.

    Quetzalcoatl's PyramidCan you see why I had to put off posting this when I originally planned two weeks ago? I started off just intending to write a piece about alleged white guys showing up in ancient Mesoamerican legends, and now I’m reporting on the results of genetic testing done on Native American skeletal remains. I ended up going so far off the reservation (pun partially intended) that I didn’t know where I was headed…and still don’t. There’s lots more; this just seemed like a good stopping point. I definitely see a Part 2 somewhere in the near future. Maybe not next week, but soon – although I fear that it might not amount to anything more than a smattering of loosely connected ideas and minutiae that I couldn’t find a convenient place to include here. I barely even mentioned the Mayan elements found in some crop formations that were the inspiration for all of this to begin with. Oh well, such is life.

    As far as the opening quote which is attributed to Quetzalcoatl, I don’t know if he really said that, but it’s probably not bad advice no matter where it came from. 

    ___________________________________________________________________________________

    *If you do an image search for “Vikings in Mexico,” you get a bunch of photos of Minnesota Vikings cheerleaders on the beach. I’m not complaining, it’s just not what I was looking for.

    **I don’t mean to pick on the Catholics; they were the only Christian game in town back then. I’m sure that the Baptists, Charismatics, etc. would have been doing the same thing if they had existed at the time.

     

    and all the devils are here